Advertisement

Mock trials and web-based education using malpractice cases: A randomised controlled trial

Published:October 03, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2022.09.014

      ABSTRACT

      Background

      Web-based education using malpractice cases is increasingly used as an effective program to improve nurses' patient safety competency, and education on legal obligations is vital for nursing students.

      Aim

      To evaluate the effectiveness of web-based education using mock trials of medical malpractice cases in improving nursing students' legal obligations, patient safety competency, and critical thinking.

      Methods

      Forty-three senior nursing students were randomly assigned to be exposed to blended learning of mock trials (4 weeks) and web-based education (4 weeks) in experimental group (n = 23), and web-based education (4 weeks) alone in control group (n = 20). Pre-test (before randomisation) and post-test (after intervention) data were collected at a university in Korea between October and December 2019.

      Results

      There were statistically significant differences in patient safety competencies (t = 3.59, P = 0.001), including skills (t = 2.89, P = 0.006) and knowledge (t = 2.60, P = 0.013), as well as a significant difference in critical thinking disposition (t = 3.09, P = 0.004) between the two groups in the pre−post changes. The two groups had no difference in knowledge and cognition of legal obligation.

      Conclusion

      Blended learning of mock trials and web-based education can enhance nursing students' patient safety competency. In particular, mock trials are an active participatory learning method that helps nursing students develop critical thinking skills to ensure patient safety competency compared to web-based education alone. Incorporating mock trial education using medical malpractice cases into the curriculum could enhance nursing students' patient safety competency and critical thinking disposition.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Collegian
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Almannie R.
        • Almuhaideb M.
        • Alyami F.
        • Alkhayyal A.
        • Binsaleh S.
        The status of medical malpractice litigations in Saudi Arabia: analysis of the annual report.
        Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2021; 15: 97-100https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_908_20
        • Auraaen A.
        • Slawomirski L.
        • Klazinga N.
        The economics of patient safety in primary and ambulatory care: Flying blind.
        [OECD Health Working Papers, No. 106]. 2018; : 1-57https://doi.org/10.1787/baf425ad-en
        • Cooper E.
        Quality and safety education for nurses implementation: is it sustainable?.
        Nurse Educator. 2017; 42: S8-S11https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000415
        • Dehghanzadeh S.
        • Jafaraghaee F.
        Comparing the effects of traditional lecture and flipped classroom on nursing students' critical thinking disposition: a quasi-experimental study.
        Nurse Education Today. 2018; 71: 151-156https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.027
        • Faul F.
        • Erdfelder E.
        • Lang A.G.
        • Buchner A.
        G* Power (Version 3.1. 9.2) [software].
        University of Kiel, Kiel2014
        • Jang H.N.
        Evaluation and application of patient safety competence assessment tool: survey for nurses.
        [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Seoul National University, Seoul2013
        • Jang I.S.
        • Lee K.S.
        Effects of critical thinking and nursing practice environment on clinical decision making among nurses.
        Journal of Digital Convergence. 2019; 17: 255-264https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.2.255
        • Jin J.
        • Yi Y.J.
        Patient safety competency and the new nursing care delivery model.
        Journal of Nursing Management. 2019; 27: 1167-1175https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12788
        • Kim J.J.
        • Jung H.M.
        Effect of patient safety culture and patient safety competence on safety nursing activity among nurses working in anesthetic and recovery rooms.
        Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 2020; 26: 164-174https://doi.org/10.22650/JKCNR.2020.26.2.164
        • Kim Y.M.
        • Yoon Y.S.
        • Hong H.C.
        • Min A.
        Effects of a patient safety course using a flipped classroom approach among undergraduate nursing students: a quasi-experimental study.
        Nurse Education Today. 2019; 79: 180-187https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.033
        • Kirwan M.
        • Riklikiene O.
        • Gotlib J.
        • Fuster P.
        • Borta M.
        Regulation and current status of patient safety content in pre-registration nurse education in 27 countries: findings from the Rationing - missed nursing care (RANCARE) COST action project.
        Nurse Education in Practice. 2019; 37: 132-140https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.04.013
        • Lee N.J.
        • An J.Y.
        • Song T.M.
        • Jang H.
        • Park S.Y.
        Psychometric evaluation of a patient safety competency self-evaluation tool for nursing students.
        Journal of Nursing Education. 2014; 53: 550-562https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140922-01
        • Lennon R.P.
        • Clebak K.T.
        • Stepanian J.B.
        • Riley T.D.
        Mock trial as a learning tool in a family medicine residency.
        Family Medicine. 2020; 52: 741-744https://doi.org/10.22454/fammed.2020.405328
        • Levett-Jones T.
        • Andersen P.
        • Bogossian F.
        • Cooper S.
        • Guinea S.
        • Hopmans R.
        • et al.
        A cross-sectional survey of nursing students’ patient safety knowledge.
        Nurse Education Today. 2020; 88: 1-6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104372
        • Li S.
        • Ye X.
        • Chen W.
        Practice and effectiveness of "nursing case-based learning" course on nursing student's critical thinking ability: a comparative study.
        Nurse Education in Practice. 2019; 36: 91-96https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.03.007
        • Lim H.
        • Yi Y.
        Effects of a web-based education program for nurses using medical malpractice cases: a randomized controlled trial.
        Nurse Education Today. 2021; 104: 1-8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104997
        • Murphy M.
        • Duff J.
        • Whitney J.
        • Canales B.
        • Markham M.J.
        • Close J.
        Implementation of a mock root cause analysis to provide simulated patient safety training.
        BMJ Open Quality. 2017; 6: 1-3https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000096
        • Park M.
        • Jeong M.
        • Lee M.
        • Cullen L.
        Web-based experiential learning strategies to enhance the evidence-based-practice competence of undergraduate nursing students.
        Nurse Education Today. 2020; 91: 1-7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104466
        • Ross J.G.
        • Bruderle E.
        Student-centered teaching strategies to integrate the quality and safety education for nurses competency, safety, into a nursing course.
        Nurse Educator. 2016; 41: 278-281https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000273
        • Royce C.S.
        • Hayes M.M.
        • Schwartzstein R.M.
        Teaching critical thinking: a case for instruction in cognitive biases to reduce diagnostic errors and improve patient safety.
        Academic Medicine. 2019; 94: 187-194https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518
        • Savoth J.
        Medical malpractice case evaluation through mock trials.
        The Journal of Legal Nurse Consulting. 2018; 29: 20-23
        • Sen M.
        • Tesoro M.
        A mock trial approach: nursing competency program.
        Journal for Nurses in Staff Development. 2007; 23: 289-292https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NND.0000300836.99900.bb
        • Tingle J.
        Clinical negligence litigation: balancing the interests.
        British Journal of Nursing. 2017; 26: 898-899https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.15.898
        • Tseng H.
        • Hill L.
        The impact of high-fidelity simulation on nursing students' flexible and reflective thinking in higher education.
        Higher Learning Research Communication. 2020; 10: 52-65https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v10i2.1196
        • World Health Organization
        Patient safety: making health care safer. World Health Organization, 2017 (WHO-HIS-SDS-2017.11-eng.pdf)
        • Yi Y.J.
        Effects of a blended learning orientation program for clinical practicums of nursing students.
        The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2008; 14: 30-37https://doi.org/10.5977/JKASNE.2008.14.1.030
        • Yom Y.H.
        • Ko M.S.
        • Kim K.K.
        • Kim B.Y.
        • Min S.
        • Shin M.J.
        • Hwang J.I.
        Legal aspects of nursing management.
        Nursing management. 7th ed. Soomoon-sa, Paju2020
        • Yoon J.
        Development of an instrument for the measurement of critical thinking disposition in nursing.
        [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Catholic University, Seoul2004
        • Yoshioka-Maeda K.
        • Shiomi M.
        • Katayama T.
        • Hosoya N.
        Impact of web-based learning for health program planning competency, knowledge and skills among mid-level public health nurses: a randomized controlled trial.
        Public Health Nursing. 2019; 36: 836-846https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12642