ABSTRACT
Background
Aims
Design
Methods
Finding
Discussion
Conclusion
Keywords
1. Introduction
World Health Organization (2016). World report on ageing and health. Available from https://www.who.int/ageing/events/worldreport2015launch/en/.
- Le Reste J.Y.
- Nabbe P.
- Rivet C.
- Lygidakis C.
- Doerr C.
- Czachowski S.
- et al.
2. Literature review
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2014). Encuesta Europea de Salud en España. Nota Prensa. Available from https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176784&menu=resultados&idp=1254735573175#!tabs-1254736194728.
Ministerio de Sanidad Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. (2006). Encuesta Nacional de Salud. Madrid. Available from https://www.mssi.gob.es/gl/estadEstudios/estadisticas/encuestaNacional/encuesta2006.htm.
Idescat. (2020). Estructura per sexe i edat. Catalunya. Sèrie temporal. Banc d'estadístiques de municipis i comarques. Available from https://www.idescat.cat/pub/?id=aec&n=253.
Departament de Salut; Generalitat de Catalunya. (2015). Enquesta de salut de Catalunya. Informe dels principals resultats. Barcelona. Available from https://salutweb.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/eldepartament/estadistiquessanitaries/enquestes/esca_2015.pdf.
Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social. (2009). Unidad de Pacientes Pluripatológicos Estándares y Recomendaciones. Ministerio Sanidad y Política Sociales. Available from https://www.msc.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/docs/EyR_UPP.pdf.
World Health Organization. (2020). Thirty-year retrospective of Catalan health planning. Available from https://www.euro.who.int/en/health.topics/Healthsystems/healthsystemsfinancing/publications/2020/thirtyyearretrospectiveofcatalanhealthplanning2020.
Andradas-Aragonés, E., Labrador-Cañadas, M.V., Lizarbe-Alonso, V., Molina-Olivas, M. (2014). Documento de consenso sobre prevención de fragilidad y caídas en la persona mayor. Estrategia de Promoción de la Salud y Prevención en el SNS. Available from: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/prevPromocion/Estrategia/docs/Fragilida-dyCaidas_personamayor.pdf.
World Health Organization. (2020). Thirty-year retrospective of Catalan health planning. Available from https://www.euro.who.int/en/health.topics/Healthsystems/healthsystemsfinancing/publications/2020/thirtyyearretrospectiveofcatalanhealthplanning2020.
- Sasseville M.
- Chouinard M.C.
- Martín F.
3. Participants, ethics and methods
3.1 Aims
3.2 Design
3.3 Setting
3.4 Participants
3.5 Data collection
3.6 Instruments
- aClinical variables: (i) Frailty is an indicator of changes in the multidimensional state of the CCP's health and, as such, is the best predictor of disability and dependence (Amblàs-Novellas et al., 2018). It was measured through the Frail-VIG Index (“VIG” is the Spanish/Catalan abbreviation for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment), a useful instrument for assessing frail older adults. The Frail-VIX Index contains 22 simple questions that assess 25 different deficits. (ii) Therapeutic adherence according to theWorld Health Organization 2003is “the extent to which a person's behaviour – taking medication, following a diet, and/or executing lifestyle changes, corresponds with agreed recommendations from a health care provider”. It was measured using the Morisky-Green Test (
World Health Organization. (2003). Adherence to long-term therapies. Evidence for action. Available from https://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_full_report.pdf.
Morisky et al., 1986), which consists of a series of four dichotomous questions, whose answers reflect the patient's degree of compliance. The Spanish version was validated byVal-Jiménez et al., 1992. (iii) Morbidity was measured through the Adjusted Morbidity Groups. They are categorised into six morbidity groups, divided in turn into five levels of complexity, plus a healthy population group (Monterde et al., 2016). (iv) Active clinical diagnoses and the most prevalent reasons for visits to urgent care by CCPs. - bFunctional variables: (i) Level of functioning was measured through the Lawton and Brody Scale (Lawton and Brody, 1969), which collects dichotomous information on eight indicators of the degree of functioning in the instrumental activities of daily living. The Spanish version was validated byVergara et al., 2012. (ii) Level of independence was measured using the Barthel Index (Mahoney and Barthel, 1965), which evaluates independence in 10 basic activities of daily living. The patient is scored between a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 100. The Spanish version was validated byBaztán et al., 1993.
- cMental health variables: (i) Cognitive level was measured using the Pfeiffer Questionnaire (Pfeiffer, 1975) which includes 10 dichotomous questions. The patient is scored between a minimum of 0 and maximum of 10 points. The questionnaire explores temporal-spatial orientation, recent and remote memory, information on recent events, ability to concentrate, and ability to perform simple arithmetic. The Spanish version was validated byMartínez de la Iglesia et al., 2001. (ii) Depression level was measured through the Geriatric Depression Scale (5-GDS) (
- Martínez de la Iglesia J.
- Dueñas- Herrero R.
- Onís-Vilches M.C.
- Aguado-Taberne C.
- Albert-Colomer C.
- Luque-Luque R.
Adaptación y validación al castellano del cuestionario de Pfeiffer (SPMSQ) para detectar la existencia de deterioro cognitivo en personas mayores de 65 años.Medicina Clínica. 2001; 117: 129-134Sheikh and Yesavage, 1986), a reduced form of the 15-item version, consisting of items 1, 3, 4, 6, and 15. The Spanish version was validated byOrtega-Orcos et al., 2007. - dSocial variables: (i) Risk of social exclusion was measured through the Escala d´Indicadors de Risc Social, which evaluates the person's social risk (Cabrera et al., 1999). It consists of six dichotomous questions and makes it possible to identify persons in need of intervention.
- eNutrition variables: (i) Risk of malnutrition was measured through the Mini Nutritional Assessment Scale (MNA) (), which was specifically developed to assess the risk of malnutrition in the frail elderly. The Spanish version was validated bySalvá et al., 1996.
- fMovement variables: (i) Pain level was measured through the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS) (). The Spanish version was validated byLázaro et al., 2003). (ii) According to the (World Health Organization 2021), falls are “unintended events that cause you to lose your balance and hit the ground or another firm surface to stop you”. The total number of falls experienced annually by the PCCs was collected. (iii) Mobility level was measured using the timed Up & Go Test (
World Health Organization. (2021). Newsroom. Falls. Available from https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/falls.
Podsiadlo and Richardson, 1991), which makes it possible to quantify the mobility and functional capacity of older patients. The Spanish version was validated byNavarro et al., 2001.- Navarro C.
- Lázaro M.
- Cuesta F.
- Vitoria A.
- Roiz H.
Métodos clínicos de evaluación de los trastornos del equilibrio y la marcha.Grupo de trabajo de caídas de la Sociedad Española de Geriatría y Gerontología: Evaluación del anciano con caídas de repetición. Ed. Mapfre, Madrid2001: p. 101-22https://doi.org/10.1016/S0211-139X(07)73570-9
3.7 Data analysis
3.8 Ethical considerations
4. Results
4.1 Primary outcomes
4.2 Secondary outcomes
- aClinical dimension: Frailty was present in 69.3% (n = 2,586), with a therapeutic adherence of 81.7% (n = 3,050). Of the CCPS, 71.4% (n = 2,665) presented an Adjusted Morbidity Groups score of level 4 (chronic disease affecting two or three bodily systems; Table 1).Table 1Clinical dimension 2019.
Questionnaire Item n Mean ± SD Total n Clinical dimension: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) Yes (Frailty) 2,586 (69.3%) 3,732 (100%) No (Frailty) 1,146 (30.7%) Adjusted Morbidity Groups (AMG) GMA-2 (acute pathology) 48 (1.3%) 3.7±0.4 3,405 (91.2%) GMA-3 (chronic illness in one system) 692 (18.5%) GMA-4 (chronic illness in 2 or 3 systems) 2,665 (71.4%) Morisky-Green Test Yes (therapeutic adherence) 3,050 (81.7%) 3,732 (100%) No (therapeutic adherence) 682 (18.3%) Main active diagnosis Hypertension 2,971 (3.2%) 21.4±4.4 91,813 (100%) Urinary incontinence 1,881 (2%) Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 1,539 (1.6%) Other diagnosis 85,422 (93%) Main reason for visit Respiratory 1,600 (21.4%) 7,457 (100%) Traumatological 1,493 (20%) Digestive 665 (8.9%) Other 3,699 (49.7%) Source: compiled by author.a Total number of main active diagnosis.b Total number of main reasons for visit.c The total does not reach 100% because not all patient records had been updated at the time of the study.
- aFunctional dimension: On the Lawton and Brody Scale, 15.4% (n = 576) of the CCPs showed low functioning for the instrumental activities of daily living. In contrast, on the Barthel Index, 5% (n = 187) were totally dependent in activities of daily living, while 51.6% (n = 1,926) were totally independent (Table 2).Table 2Functional dimension 2019.
Questionnaire Item n Mean ± SD Total n Functional dimension Lawton and Brody scale (IADL) Total independence (8) 159 (4.3%) 3.3 ± 2.5 (50.7%) Slight dependence (6 a 7) 247 (6.6%) Moderate dependence (4 a 5) 417 (11.2%) Severe dependence (2 to 3) 493 (13.2%) Total dependence (0 a 1) 576 (15.4%) Barthel Index (ADL) Total independence (> 60) 1,926 (51.6%) 68.8 ± 27.3 2,777 (74.4%) Moderate dependence (40 to 55) 442 (11.8%) Severe dependence (20 to 35) 222 (5.9%) Total dependence (<20) 187 (5.0%) Source: compiled by author.a The total does not reach 100% because not all patient records had been updated at the time of the study.b The total does not reach 100% because this questionnaire is not necessary for all CCPs. - bMental health dimension: Of the CCPS, 8.5% (n = 318) showed severe impairment, 10.8% (n = 403) moderate impairment and 12% (n = 446) mild impairment, in contrast to 40.1% (n = 1,495) who did not present cognitive impairment. Regarding the Geriatric Depression Scale (5-GDS), 11.2% (n = 420) had initial depression (Table 3).Table 3Mental health dimension 2019.
Questionnaire Item n Mean ± SD Total n Mental health dimension Pfeiffer questionnaire (Cognitive impairment) No impairment (0 to 2) 1,495 (40.1%) 2.9 ± 3.1 2,662 (71.3%) Mild impairment (3 to 4) 446 (12%) Moderate impairment (5 to 7) 403 (10.8%) Severe impairment (8 to 10) 318 (8.5%) Geriatric Depression Scale (5-GDS) (emotional impairment) No depression (0 to 1) 786 (21%) 1.5 ± 1.3 (35.9%) Initial depression (2 to 3) 420 (11.2%) Moderate depression (4) 108 (2.9%) Severe depression (5) 25 (0.7%) Source: compiled by author.a The total does not reach 100% because this questionnaire is not necessary for all CCPs. - cSocial dimension: Of the CCPs, 27.9% (n = 1,042) had low risk of social exclusion and 33.4% (n = 1,246) had no risk of social exclusion (Table 4).Table 4Social and nutritional dimensions 2019.
Questionnaire Item n Mean ± SD Total n Social dimension Escala d'Indicadors de Risc Social No risk of social exclusion (0) 1,246 (33.4%) 0.9 ± 1.2 2,528 (67.7%) Low risk of social exclusion (1 to 2) 1,042 (27.9%) Medium risk of social exclusion (3 to 4) 197 (5.3%) High risk of social exclusion (5 to 6) 43 (1.1%) Nutritional dimension Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) No (impairment) 2,110 (56.5%) 3,732 (100%) Yes (impairment) 1,623 (43.5%) Source: compiled by author.a The total does not reach 100% because this questionnaire is not necessary for all CCPs. - dNutritional dimension: Malnutrition was evident in 46.5% (n = 1,623) of the CCPs (Table 4).
- eMovement dimension: Pain was mild in 15.5% (n = 579) of CCPs, moderate in 5% (n = 187) and severe in 1.1% (n = 40) (Table 5). Regarding falls, 15.4% (n = 574) had experienced falls, with 8.4% (n = 312) falling once a year, 3.6% (n = 133) falling twice a year and 3.4% (n = 129) falling more than twice a year (Table 5). Regarding the timed Up & Go Test, 3.4% (n = 221) presented low risk of falling, 8% (n = 298) moderate risk of falling and 15.8% (n = 609) high risk of falling. (Table 5).Table 5Movement dimension 2019.
Questionnaire Item N Mean ± SD Total n Movement dimension Visual Analog Scale for Pain (EVA) Mild pain (< 3) 579 (15.5%) 2.3 ± 2.5 806 (21.6%) Moderate pain (4 to 7) 187 (5%) Severe pain (8 to 10) 40 (1.1%) Number of Annual Falls 0 falls 3,158 (84.6%) 0.8 ± 1.5 3,158 (84.6%) 1 fall 312 (8.4%) 574 (15.4%) 2 falls 133 (3.6%) > 2 falls 129 (3.4%) Timed Up & Go Test < 10 seconds: low risk of falls 221 (3.4%) 33.3 ± 27.3 1,128 (30.2%) 11 to 20 seconds: moderate risk of falls 298 (8%) >20 seconds: high risk of falls 609 (15.8%) Source: compiled by author.a The total does not reach 100% because this questionnaire is not necessary for all CCPs.
5. Discussion
- Espaulella-Panicot J.
- Molist-Brunet N.
- Sevilla-Sánchez D.
- Gónzalez-Bueno J.
- Amblàs-Novellas J.
- Solà-Bonada N.
- et al.
- Vetrano D.L.
- Palmer K.
- Marengoni A.
- Marzetti E.
- Lattanzio F.
- Roller-Wirnsberger R.
- et al.
González- Mestre, A., Piqué- Sánchez, J.L., Vila- Rull, A., & Fernández, E. (2016). L'atenció centrada en la persona en el model d´atención integrada social i sanitària de Catalunya. Available from https://xarxanet.org/sites/default/files/gene_atencio_centrada_en_la_personagener_2016.pdf.
- Esteban-Pérez M.
- Martínez -Serrano T.
- Boira-Senlí R.M.
- Castells-Trilla G.
- Nadal- Ventura S.
- Fernández-Ballart J.
- Martín-Lesende I.
- Mendibil-Crespo L.I.
- Martinez-Blanco I.
- Porto-Hormaza B.
- Maray-Gondra B.
- Aguirre-Basaras N.
- Shimada H.
- Sawyer P.
- Harada K.
- Kaneya S.
- Nihei K.
- Asakawa Y.
- et al.
5.1 Strengths and limitations
6. Conclusions
Authorship contribution statement
Ethical statement
Conflict of interest
Acknowledgements
References
- Frail-VIG index: a concise frailty evaluation tool for rapid geriatric assessment.BMC Geriatric. 2018; 18: 29https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0718-2
Andradas-Aragonés, E., Labrador-Cañadas, M.V., Lizarbe-Alonso, V., Molina-Olivas, M. (2014). Documento de consenso sobre prevención de fragilidad y caídas en la persona mayor. Estrategia de Promoción de la Salud y Prevención en el SNS. Available from: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/prevPromocion/Estrategia/docs/Fragilida-dyCaidas_personamayor.pdf.
- Índice de Barthel: instrumento válido para la valoración funcional de pacientes con enfermedades cerebrovascular.Revista Española de Gariatría y Gerontología. 1993; 28: 32-40
- Evaluación de la fiabilidad y validez de una escala de valoración social en el anciano.Atencion Primaria. 1999; 23: 434-440
Departament de Salut; Generalitat de Catalunya. (2015). Enquesta de salut de Catalunya. Informe dels principals resultats. Barcelona. Available from https://salutweb.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/eldepartament/estadistiquessanitaries/enquestes/esca_2015.pdf.
- Ageing, and the epidemiology of multimorbidity.The European Respiratory Journal. 2014; J 44: 1055-1068https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00059814
- Patient-centred prescription model to improve adequate prescription and therapeutic adherence in patients with multiple disorders.Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología. 2017; 52: 278-281https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2017.03.002
- Concordancia entre la complejidad observada desde diferentes niveles asistenciales en pacientes crónicos complejos, con enfermedad avanzada o al final de la vida mediante un modelo de abordaje de la complejidad.Medicina Paliativa. 2018; 25: 236-244https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medipa.2017.05.008
- ESPEN guidelines on nutritional support for polymorbid internal medicine patients.Clinical Nutrition. 2018; 37: 336-353https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.025
González- Mestre, A., Piqué- Sánchez, J.L., Vila- Rull, A., & Fernández, E. (2016). L'atenció centrada en la persona en el model d´atención integrada social i sanitària de Catalunya. Available from https://xarxanet.org/sites/default/files/gene_atencio_centrada_en_la_personagener_2016.pdf.
- Measurement of pain.Journal of Rheumatology. 1982; 9: 768-769
Idescat. (2020). Estructura per sexe i edat. Catalunya. Sèrie temporal. Banc d'estadístiques de municipis i comarques. Available from https://www.idescat.cat/pub/?id=aec&n=253.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2014). Encuesta Europea de Salud en España. Nota Prensa. Available from https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176784&menu=resultados&idp=1254735573175#!tabs-1254736194728.
- Projections of multi-morbidity in the older population in England to 2035: estimates from the Population Ageing and Care Simulation (PACSim) model.Age and Ageing. 2018; 47: 1-7https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx201
- Medida del dolor postoperatorio: análisis de la sensibilidad de diversos instrumentos de autovaloración.Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación. 2003; 50: 230-236
- Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.The Gerontologist. 1969; 9: 179-186https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179
- The European General Practice Research Network presents the translations of its comprehensive definition of multimorbidity in family medicine in ten European languages.Plos One. 2015; 10e0115796https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115796
- Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index.Maryland Stade Medical Journal. 1965; 14: 61-65
- Validez predictiva del cuestionario Vida considerado pérdida funcional, institucionalizado o muerte en pacientes pluripatológicos.Revista Española Geriatria y Gerontología. 2020; 55: 25-28https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2019.08.001
- Adaptación y validación al castellano del cuestionario de Pfeiffer (SPMSQ) para detectar la existencia de deterioro cognitivo en personas mayores de 65 años.Medicina Clínica. 2001; 117: 129-134
Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social. (2009). Unidad de Pacientes Pluripatológicos Estándares y Recomendaciones. Ministerio Sanidad y Política Sociales. Available from https://www.msc.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/docs/EyR_UPP.pdf.
Ministerio de Sanidad Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. (2006). Encuesta Nacional de Salud. Madrid. Available from https://www.mssi.gob.es/gl/estadEstudios/estadisticas/encuestaNacional/encuesta2006.htm.
- Los grupos de morbilidad ajustados: nuevo agrupador de morbilidad poblacional de utilidad en el ámbito de la atención primaria.Atención Primaria. 2016; 48: 678-682https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2016.06.003
- Concurrent and predicti-ve validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence.Medical Care. 1986; 24: 67-74https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198601000-00007
- Estudio de la situación nutricional de pacientes mayores de 65 años incluidos en el programa de atención domiciliaria de una población urbana.Aten. Primaria. 2018; 50: 88-95https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2017.02.006
Nacional Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2016). Multimorbidity: clinical assessment and management (NICE Guideline 56). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4843.
- Métodos clínicos de evaluación de los trastornos del equilibrio y la marcha.(En: Sociedad Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, editores)Grupo de trabajo de caídas de la Sociedad Española de Geriatría y Gerontología: Evaluación del anciano con caídas de repetición. Ed. Mapfre, Madrid2001: p. 101-22https://doi.org/10.1016/S0211-139X(07)73570-9
- Validación de la versión española de 5 y 15 ítems de la Escala de Depresión Geriátrica en personas mayores en Atención Primaria.Revista Clínica Española. 2007; 207: 559-562https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2565(07)73477-X
- The epidemiology of polypharmacy.Clinical Medicine. 2016; 16: 465-469https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.16-5-465
- A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain déficit in elderly patients.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1975; 23: 433-441
- The timed «Up & Go»: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1991; 39: 142-148
- Managing multimorbility: Profiles of integrated care approaches targeting people with multiple chronic conditions in Europe.Health Policy. 2018; 122: 44-52https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.10.002
- Un nuevo instrumento para la valoración nutricional en geriatría: el «Mini Nutritional Assessment» (MNA).Revista multidisciplinar de gerontología. 1996; 6: 319-328
- Patient-reported outcomes in multimorbility intervention research: a scoping review.International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2018; 77: 145-153https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.09.016
- Adverse drug events in patients with advanced chronic conditions who have a prognosis of limited life expectancy at hospital admission.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2017; 73: 79-89https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-016-2136-8
- Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version.Clinical Gerontologist. 1986; 5: 165-172
- Predictive validity of the classification schema for functional mobility tests in instrumental activities of daily living decline among older adults.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2010; 91: 241-246https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.027
- Estudio descriptivo del cumplimiento del tratamiento farmacológico antihipertensivo y validación del Test de Morisky y Green.Atención Primaria. 1992; 10: 767-770
- Validation of the Spanish versión of the Lawton IADL. Scale for its application in elderly people.Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2012; 10: 130https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10130
- Frailty and multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2019; 74: 659-666https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly110
- New horizons in multimorbidity in older adults.Age and Ageing. 2017; 46: 882-888https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx150
World Health Organization (2016). World report on ageing and health. Available from https://www.who.int/ageing/events/worldreport2015launch/en/.
World Health Organization. (2020). Thirty-year retrospective of Catalan health planning. Available from https://www.euro.who.int/en/health.topics/Healthsystems/healthsystemsfinancing/publications/2020/thirtyyearretrospectiveofcatalanhealthplanning2020.
World Health Organization. (2003). Adherence to long-term therapies. Evidence for action. Available from https://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_full_report.pdf.
World Health Organization. (2021). Newsroom. Falls. Available from https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/falls.
Article info
Publication history
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy