Research Article| Volume 29, ISSUE 6, P924-930, December 2022

Nursing assessment and management of nutrition in older people with cancer: An integrative review



      There is a risk of malnutrition when older people are diagnosed with cancer, highlighting the need for nutritional assessments and appropriate management to be undertaken by healthcare professionals including nurses. The absence of a standardised assessment method and management of nutrition in older people creates a gap in clinical practice and warrants further research.


      The aim of this review was to explore the current nutritional assessment methods and evidence-based interventions for improving nutritional outcomes in older people with cancer.


      An integrative literature review was conducted using electronic databases. Papers were limited to those published in English between 2009 and 2021. Search terms included older adult, elder, geriatric, senior, cancer, nutrition, malnutrition, hospital, and inpatient across four databases: Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Scopus. Using the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 303 articles were screened. A Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) (2018) was used for quality appraisal. Concept analysis explored themes across the included articles.


      The themes from the analysis of 10 primary research articles, which included 5,327 participants, were (i) types of nutritional assessment and (ii) management of older people with cancer. The main nutritional assessment scales used were the Mini Nutrition Assessment and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment.


      The completion of a comprehensive nutritional assessment by health professionals, including nurses, could facilitate early dietary intervention in older persons with cancer. This would enable supportive dietary advice and supplementation to improve health outcomes.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Collegian
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Abd Allah E.S.
        • Gad H.M.M.
        • Abdel-Aziz H.R.
        Nutritional status and its contributing factors among older adults with cancer receiving chemotherapy.
        Clinical Nursing Research. 2020; 29: 650-658
        • Arends J.
        • Baracos V.
        • Bertz H.
        • Bozzetti F.
        • Calder P.
        • Deutz N.
        • et al.
        ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition.
        Clinical Nutrition. 2017; 36: 1187-1196
      1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2021). Cancer in Australia 2019.

        • Barao K.
        • Abe Vicente Cavagnari M.
        • Silva Fucuta P.
        • Manoukian Forones N.
        Association between nutrition status and survival in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.
        Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2017; 32: 658-663
        • Botero L.
        • Agarwal E.
        • Berry R.
        • Gillespie K.
        • Isenring E.
        • McCarthy A.L.
        Nutrition risk and mortality in older oncology patients: an exploratory study.
        Nutrition & Dietetics: The Journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. 2019; 77: 449-455
        • Bourdel-Marchasson I.
        • Bourdel-Marchasson I.
        • Blanc-Bisson C.
        • Blanc-Bisson C.
        • Doussau A.
        • Doussau A.
        • et al.
        Nutritional advice in older patients at risk of malnutrition during treatment for chemotherapy: a two-year randomized controlled trial.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9e108687
      2. Clinical Oncological Society of Australia. (2022). Evidence-based practice guidelines for the nutritional management of adult patients with head and neck cancer.

        • Davis J.W.
        • Chung R.
        • Juarez D.T.
        Prevalence of comorbid conditions with aging among patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
        Hawai'i Medical Journal. 2011; 70: 209-213
        • Delves-Yates C.
        • Stockl A.
        • Moore J.
        Making sense of concept analysis.
        Nurse Research. 2018; 25: 43-46
      3. European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. (2021). ESPEN guidelines.

        • Hong Q.N.
        • Fàbregues S.
        • Bartlett G.
        • Boardman F.
        • Cargo M.
        • Dagenais P.
        • et al.
        The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers.
        Education for Information. 2018; 34: 285-291
        • Lacau St Guily J.
        • Bouvard É.
        • Raynard B.
        • Goldwasser F.
        • Maget B.
        • Prevost A.
        • et al.
        NutriCancer: a French observational multicentre cross-sectional study of malnutrition in elderly patients with cancer.
        Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2018; 9: 74-80
        • Magnuson A.
        • Lemelman T.
        • Pandya C.
        • Goodman M.
        • Noel M.
        • Tejani M.
        • et al.
        Geriatric assessment with management intervention in older adults with cancer: a randomized pilot study.
        Supportive Care in Cancer. 2018; 26: 605-613
        • Martucci R.B.
        • Barbosa M.V.
        • D'Almeida C.
        • Rodrigues V.D.
        • Bergmann A.
        • De Pinho N.B.
        • et al.
        Undernutrition as independent predictor of early mortality in elderly cancer patients.
        Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2017; 41: 278
        • Mislang A.R.
        • Di Donato S.
        • Hubbard J.
        • Krishna L.
        • Mottino G.
        • Bozzetti F.
        • et al.
        Nutritional management of older adults with gastrointestinal cancers: an International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) review paper.
        Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2018; 9: 382-392
        • Mostame P.
        • Moharramipour A.
        • Hossein-Zadeh G.A.
        • Babajani-Feremi A.
        Statistical significance assessment of phase synchrony in the presence of background couplings: an ECoG study.
        Brain Topography. 2019; 32: 882-896
        • Pace R.
        • Pluye P.
        • Bartlett G.
        • Macaulay A.C.
        • Salsberg J.
        • Jagosh J.
        • et al.
        Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review.
        International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2012; 49: 47-53
        • Page M.J.
        • McKenzie J.E.
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Boutron I.
        • Hoffmann T.C.
        • Mulrow C.D.
        • et al.
        The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
        BMJ. 2021; 372: 71
        • Pluye P.
        • Hong Q.N.
        Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews.
        Annual Review of Public Health. 2014; 35: 29-45
        • Sobrini P.
        • Sánchez-Castellano C.
        • Cruz-Jentoft A.J.
        MNA-SF as a screening tool for malnutrition diagnosed with the glim criteria in older persons with cancer.
        European Geriatric Medicine. 2021; 12: 653-656
        • Ten Cate D.
        • Ettema R.G.A.
        • Huisman-de Waal G.
        • Bell J.J.
        • Verbrugge R.
        • Schoonhoven L.
        • et al.
        Interventions to prevent and treat malnutrition in older adults to be carried out by nurses: a systematic review.
        Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2020; 29: 1883-1902
        • Walker L.O.
        • Avant K.C.
        Strategies for theory construction in nursing. Vol. 4. Pearson/Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, New Jersey2005
        • Whittemore R.
        • Knafl K.
        The integrative review: updated methodology.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005; 52: 546-553
      4. World Health Organization. (2021). Cancer tomorrow.

        • Yanagi A.
        • Murase M.
        • Sumita Y.I.
        • Taniguchi H.
        Investigation of nutritional status using the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form and analysis of the relevant factors in patients with head and neck tumour.
        Gerodontology. 2017; 34: 227-231
        • Zhang L.
        • Su Y.
        • Wang C.
        • Sha Y.
        • Zhu H.
        • Xie S.
        • et al.
        Assessing the nutritional status of elderly Chinese lung cancer patients using the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA®) tool.
        Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2013; 8: 287-291
        • Zhang L.
        • Wang C.
        • Sha S.Y.
        • Kwauk S.
        • Miller A.R.
        • Xie M.S.
        • et al.
        Mini-nutrition assessment, malnutrition, and postoperative complications in elderly Chinese patients with lung cancer.
        Journal of Balkan Union of Oncology. 2012; 17: 323-326
        • Zhang X.
        • Sun M.
        • McKoy J.M.
        • Bhulani N.N.A.
        • Valero V.
        • Barcenas C.H.
        • et al.
        Malnutrition in older patients with cancer: appraisal of the Mini Nutritional Assessment, weight loss, and body mass index.
        Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2018; 9: 81-83
        • Zhang X.
        • Tang M.
        • Zhang Q.
        • Zhang K.-P.
        • Guo Z.-Q.
        • Xu H.-X.
        • et al.
        The GLIM criteria as an effective tool for nutrition assessment and survival prediction in older adult cancer patients.
        Clinical Nutrition. 2021; 40: 1224-1232