Advertisement
Review| Volume 30, ISSUE 1, P147-153, February 2023

Using affective events theory to conceptualise nurses’ emotional behaviour: A scoping review

      ABSTRACT

      Background

      Affective Events Theory is a framework increasingly used in the organisational sciences to predict employee emotional reactions to workplace events and environments. However, this theory has been underutilised in the context of examining the behaviour of nurses.

      Aims

      This review aimed to identify and describe how to apply Affective Events Theory to conceptualise nursing professionals’ emotional reactions and behaviours within patient care settings.

      Review methods

      The scoping review procedures were based on published recommendations, including searches in seven databases for sources meeting eligibility criteria and a protocol-driven approach for data screening, abstraction, and synthesis.

      Findings

      Thirteen sources met inclusion criteria by using Affective Events Theory to conceptualise emotional responses and behaviours among nurses within patient care settings. Review sources discussed affective events in nursing settings, including work-related tasks and workplace violence/bullying. Nurses’ affective reactions to these events prompted worker attitudes and outcomes, including their intention to stay/leave, avoidance behaviours, accident-prone behaviours, and unethical actions.

      Discussion

      Affective Events Theory was reported as a sound approach for theorising in nursing settings. However, the low number of records identified may suggest that this theory has been scarcely applied in this context.

      Conclusion

      Affective Events Theory has likely not been utilised in health sciences literature to the extent possible, representing a substantial opportunity for theorising regarding nursing professionals’ emotional reactions and behaviours. From a practical perspective, this review also potentially serves to support nurses as they seek to improve patient care and caregiver outcomes.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Collegian
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Banfo B.A.
        • Dogbe C.S.K.
        • Mingle H.
        Abusive customer behaviour and frontline employee turnover intentions in the banking industry: The mediating role of employee satisfaction.
        Cogent Business and Management. 2018; 5: 1-15https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1522753
        • Christensen S.S.
        • Lassche M.
        • Banks D.
        • Smith G.
        • Inzunza T.M.
        Reducing patient aggression through a non-violent patient de-escalation program: A descriptive quality improvement process.
        Worldviews of Evidence-Based Nursing. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12540
        • Christensen S.S.
        • Wilson B.L.
        Why nurses do not report patient aggression: A review and appraisal of the literature.
        Journal of Nursing Management. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13618
        • Crismon D.
        • Mansfield K.J.
        • Hiatt S.O.
        • Christensen S.S.
        • Cloyes K.G.
        COVID-19 pandemic impact on experiences and perceptions of nurse graduates.
        Journal of Professional Nursing. 2021; 37: 857-865https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.06.008
        • Domagalski T.A.
        • Steelman L.A.
        The impact of work events and disposition on the experience and expression of employee anger [Review].
        Organizational Analysis. 2005; 13: 31-52
        • Fiest K.M.
        • Krewulak K.D.
        • Makuk K.
        • Jaworska N.
        • Hernández L.
        • Bagshaw S.M.
        • et al.
        A modified delphi process to prioritize experiences and guidance related to ICU restricted visitation policies during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
        Critcal Care Explorations. 2021; 3: e0562https://doi.org/10.1097/cce.0000000000000562
        • Fisher C.D.
        Antecedents and consequences of real-time affective reactions at work.
        Motivation and Emotion. 2002; 26: 3-30https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015190007468
        • Gabriel A.S.
        • Diefendorff J.M.
        • Erickson R.J.
        The relations of daily task accomplishment satisfaction with changes in affect: a multilevel study in nurses.
        Journal of Applied Psychology. 2011; 96: 1095-1104https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023937
        • Game A.M.
        Negative emotions in supervisory relationships: the role of relational models.
        Human Relations. 2008; 61: 355-393https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708088998
        • Goerdeler K.J.
        • Wegge J.
        • Schrod N.
        • Bilinska P.
        • Rudolf M.
        Yuck, that's disgusting!”—“No, not to me!”: Antecedents of disgust in geriatric care and its relation to emotional exhaustion and intention to leave.
        Motivation and Emotion. 2015; 39: 247-259https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9431-4
        • Guenter H.
        • van Emmerik I.J.
        • Schreurs B.
        The negative effects of delays in information exchange: Looking at workplace relationships from an affective events perspective.
        Human Resource Management Review. 2014; 24: 238-298https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2014.02.001
        • Heale R.
        • Noble H.
        Integration of a theoretical framework into your research study.
        Evidence-Based Nursing. 2019; 22: 36-37https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103077
        • Isbell L.M.
        • Boudreaux E.D.
        • Chimowitz H.
        • Liu G.
        • Cyr E.
        • Kimball E.
        What do emergency department physicians and nurses feel? A qualitative study of emotions, triggers, regulation strategies, and effects on patient care.
        BMJ Quality and Safety. 2020; 29: 815-825https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010179
        • Isbell L.M.
        • Tager J.
        • Beals K.
        • Liu G.
        Emotionally evocative patients in the emergency department: a mixed methods investigation of providers’ reported emotions and implications for patient safety.
        BMJ Quality and Safety. 2020; 29: 803-814https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010110
        • Kozlowski D.
        • Hutchinson M.
        • Hurley J.
        • Rowley J.
        • Sutherland J.
        The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review.
        BMC Medical Education. 2017; 17: 255https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7
        • Krzeminska A.
        • Lim J.
        • Härtel C.E.J.
        Psychological capital and occupational stress in emergency services teams: Empowering effects of servant leadership and workgroup emotional climate.
        In Research on Emotion in Organizations. Vol. 14. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK2018: 189-215https://doi.org/10.1108/S1746-979120180000014017
        • Li M.
        • Liu J.
        • Zheng J.
        • Liu K.
        • Wang J.
        • Miner Ross A.
        • et al.
        The relationship of workplace violence and nurse outcomes: gender difference study on a propensity score matched sample.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2020; 76: 600-610https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14268
        • Li Y.F.
        • Chao M.
        • Shih C.T.
        Nurses’ intention to resign and avoidance of emergency department violence: a moderated mediation model.
        International Emergency Nursing. 2018; 39: 55-61https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2017.09.004
        • Mohr K.A.
        The relationship between workplace bullying and job satisfaction among United States-based nursing professionals (Publication Number 28149596) [D.B.A., Capella University].
        ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, Ann Arbor2020
        • Nadim M.
        • Zafar M.A.
        Evaluation of nurses’ job engagement as an outcome of experienced compassion in the workplace, using the lens of affective event theory.
        SAGE Open. 2021; 11https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211058185
        • Nwanzu C.L.
        • Babalola S.S.
        Examining the moderating role of workload in the relationship between emotional intelligence and caring behavior in healthcare organizations.
        International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management. 2020; 15: 17-29
        • Pollock D.
        • Davies E.L.
        • Peters M.D.J.
        • Tricco A.C.
        • Alexander L.
        • McInerney P.
        • et al.
        Undertaking a scoping review: a practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2021; 77: 2102-2113https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14743
        • Puspitasari I.
        • Fauzi S.S.M.
        • Ho C.Y.
        Factors driving users’ engagement in patient social network systems.
        Informatics. 2021; 8 (Article 8)https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8010008
        • Qi L.
        • Cai D.
        • Liu B.
        • Feng T.
        Effect of workplace ostracism on emotional exhaustion and unethical behaviour among Chinese nurses: a time-lagged three-wave survey.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14405
        • Teo S.T.T.
        • Nguyen D.
        • Trevelyan F.
        • Lamm F.
        • Boocock M.
        Workplace bullying, psychological hardiness, and accidents and injuries in nursing: A moderated mediation model.
        PLoS One. 2021; 16 (January 1stArticle e0244426)https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244426
        • Todorova G.
        • Bear J.
        • Weingart L.
        Can conflict be energizing? A study of task conflict, positive emotions, and job satisfaction.
        Journal of Applied Psychology. 2014; 99: 451-467https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035134
        • Tricco A.C.
        • Lillie E.
        • Zarin W.
        • O'Brien K.K.
        • Colquhoun H.
        • Levac D.
        • et al.
        PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation.
        Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018; 169: 467-473https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850
        • Wang H.
        • Li Y.
        Role overload and Chinese nurses’ satisfaction with work-family balance: the role of negative emotions and core self-evaluations.
        Current Psychology. 2021; 40: 5515-5525https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00494-5
      1. Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: an annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp. 1-74). JAI Press. Greenwich, CT.

      2. Yagil D. (2021). Abuse from organizational outsiders: customer aggression and incivility. In P. D'Cruz, E. Noronha, L. Keashly, & S. Tye-Williams (Eds). Special topics and particular occupations, Professions and sectors. Handbooks of workplace bullying, emotional abuse and harassment (Vol. 4). Springer. Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-5308-5_3.