Nurse- and midwife-led trials in Australia and New Zealand: Scoping review protocol



      Research led by nurses or midwives has the potential to successfully address current issues in clinical care. High-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to inform evidence-based practice; however, nursing and midwifery research has commonly been nonexperimental. Two connected scoping reviews of nurse- and midwife-led randomised controlled trials within Australia and New Zealand will be conducted to highlight potential research directions and identify resources for future research.


      The purpose of the two reviews is to map the number and types of randomised controlled trials led by nurses or midwives within Australia and New Zealand.


      The concept of interest is randomised controlled trials with a lead principal investigator holding nursing or midwifery credentials. The lead principal investigator must report an institutional affiliation in Australia or New Zealand, and the trial must recruit at a minimum of one site in Australia or New Zealand. Searches for academic literature will be conducted using Pubmed, Emcare, and Scopus. Sources for grey literature will include the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, and grant outcomes published by the National Health and Medical Research Council, Medical Research Future Fund, and Health Research Council of New Zealand. Data analysis and presentation will be conducted separately for each review.


      These reviews will comprehensively map the experimental research activity of nurses and midwives within Australia and New Zealand and highlight potential research directions. From this, strategies to facilitate high quality nurse- and midwife-led trials can be developed, which are vital for informing evidence-based practice.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Collegian
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Australian Clinical Trials Alliance. (2020). Improving impact of clinical trials through implementability. Retrieved from

      2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2016). Australia's health 2016. Australia's health series no. 15. Cat. no. AUS 199. Retrieved from

        • Borbasi S.
        • Emden C.
        • Jackson D.
        Nursing research programs gather strength in Australia.
        Collegian. 2005; 12: 7-10
        • Borbasi S.
        • Hawes C.
        • Wilkes L.
        • Stewart M.
        • May D.
        Measuring the outputs of Australian nursing research published 1995–2000.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002; 38: 489-497
        • Bourne A.M.
        • Whittle S.L.
        • Richards B.L.
        • Maher C.G.
        • Buchbinder R.
        The scope, funding and publication of musculoskeletal clinical trials performed in Australia.
        Medical Journal of Australia. 2014; 200: 88-91
        • Charalambous A.
        • Wells M.
        • Campbell P.
        • Torrens C.
        • Östlund U.
        • Oldenmenger W.
        • et al.
        A scoping review of trials of interventions led or delivered by cancer nurses.
        International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2018; 86: 36-43
      3. Department of Health. (2019). Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) grant recipients. Retrieved from

        • Gonella S.
        • Di Giulio P.
        • Palese A.
        • Dimonte V.
        • Campagna S.
        Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies published in nursing journals: Findings from a scoping review with implications for further research.
        Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2019; 16: 299-309
      4. Health Research Council of New Zealand. (2020). HRC research repository. Retrieved from

        • Hopia H.
        • Heikkilä J.
        Nursing research priorities based on CINAHL database: A scoping review.
        Nursing Open. 2020; 7: 483-494
        • Li T.
        • Higgins J.P.T.
        • Deeks J.J.
        Chapter 5: Collecting data.
        in: Higgins J.P.T. Thomas J. Chandler J. Cumpston M. Li T. Page M. Welch V. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane, 2020
        • Mantzoukas S.
        The research evidence published in high impact nursing journals between 2000 and 2006: A quantitative content analysis.
        International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2009; 46: 479-489
      5. Ministry of Health. (2016). Health of the health workforce 2015. Retrieved from

        • Munday J.
        • Higgins N.
        • Mathew S.
        • Dalgleish L.
        • Batterbury A.S.
        • Burgess L.
        • et al.
        Nurse-Led randomized controlled trials in the perioperative setting: A scoping review.
        Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2020; 13: 647-660
      6. National Health and Medical Research Council. (2020). Outcomes of funding rounds. Retrieved from

        • Peters M.D.J.
        • Godfrey C.
        • McInerney P.
        • Munn Z.
        • Tricco A.C.
        • Khalil H.
        Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews.
        in: Aromataris E. Munn Z. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI, Adelaide2020
        • Peters M.D.J.
        • Marnie C.
        • Tricco A.C.
        • Pollock D.
        • Munn Z.
        • Alexander L.
        • et al.
        Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
        JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2020; 18
        • Pollock D.
        • Davies E.L.
        • Peters M.D.J.
        • Tricco A.C.
        • Alexander L.
        • McInerney P.
        • et al.
        Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2021;
      7. Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario. (2020). International affairs and best practice guidelines. Retrieved from

        • Tricco A.C.
        • Lillie E.
        • Zarin W.
        • O'Brien K.K.
        • Colquhoun H.
        • Levac D.
        • et al.
        PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation.
        Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018; 169: 467-473
        • Tufanaru C.
        • Munn Z.
        • Aromataris E.
        • Campbell J.
        • Hopp L.
        Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness.
        in: Aromataris E. Munn Z. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI, Adelaide2020
        • Wilkes L.
        • Jackson D.
        Trends in publication of research papers by Australian-based nurse authors.
        Collegian. 2011; 18: 125-130