Advertisement

‘We learn from our mistakes’: Nursing students’ perceptions of a productive failure simulation

      Abstract

      Background

      Productive failure simulations require students to participate in a simulation before receiving instruction. This approach contrasts with traditional simulations that typically begin with instruction followed by the simulation. Although previous studies have demonstrated that productive failure facilitates meaningful learning outcomes, students’ perspectives after being exposed to this approach have not been examined in simulation-based learning.

      Objective

      To explore nursing students’ perceptions of a productive failure simulation.

      Design

      Descriptive exploratory study.

      Participants

      Undergraduate nursing students from one large metropolitan Australian university.

      Methods

      Students involved in a productive failure simulation were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews on completion of their simulation experience. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and the qualitative data were subjected to thematic analysis.

      Findings

      Fifteen small group interviews and seven individual interviews were conducted (n = 66). Three themes emerged from the analysis of the qualitative data: (i) the benefits of simulation prior to instruction; (ii) the value of performing a second simulation; and (iii) the importance of normalising errors.

      Conclusion

      The productive failure simulations helped students identify their knowledge and skill deficits and this acted as a catalyst for their learning. The normalisation of errors by the educator minimised the stress of trying to be “perfect” and assisted students to persevere despite setbacks. The provision of a second simulation helped the students rectify their errors in preparation for their future clinical practice. These aspects were considered essential for a meaningful productive failure simulation experience.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Collegian
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Aubin D.
        • King S.
        Developing a culture of safety: Exploring students' perceptions of errors in an interprofessional setting.
        Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2015; 29: 646-648
        • Bearman M.
        • Greenhill J.
        • Nestel D.
        The power of simulation: A large-scale narrative analysis of learners’ experiences.
        Medical education. 2018; 53: 369-379
        • Bjork R.A.
        • Bjork E.L.
        Forgetting as the friend of learning: Implications for teaching and self-regulated learning.
        Advances in Physiology Education. 2019; 43: 164-167
        • Cao L.
        • Jacobson M.J.
        • Markauskaite L.
        • Lai P.K.
        The use of productive failure to learn genetics in a game-based environment.
        Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2020 (, Retrieved May 22, 2020 from https://www.researchgate.net)
        • Cheung R.Y.-M.
        • Au T.K.-f.
        Nursing students’ anxiety and clinical performance.
        Journal of Nursing Education. 2011; 50: 286-289
      1. Chi, M. T. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (Vol. 5, pp. 161–238): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

        • Efird J.
        Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes.
        International journal of environmental research and public health. 2011; 8: 15-20
        • Follmann D.
        • Proschan M.
        The effect of estimation and biasing strategies on selection bias in clinical trials with permuted blocks.
        Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. 1994; 39: 1-17
        • Gibbs G.
        Analyzing qualitative data.
        SAGE Publications Ltd, London2018 (2nd edition. ed.)
        • Haahr M.
        Random Sequence Generator.
        Retrieved 20 August 2019. 2010; (Available from:) (Accessed 20 Aug 2019)
        https://www.random.org/
        Date accessed: August 20, 2019
        • Hesketh B.
        The science of science teaching and learning.
        in: Paper presented at the Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education, Sydney, Australia2012
        • Jacobson M.J.
        • Markauskaite L.
        • Portolese A.
        • Kapur M.
        • Lai P.K.
        • Roberts G.
        Designs for learning about climate change as a complex system.
        Learning and instruction. 2017; 52: 1-14
        • Kapur M.
        Comparing Learning From Productive Failure and Vicarious Failure.
        Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2014; 23: 651-677
        • Kapur M.
        • Bielaczyc K.
        Designing for productive failure.
        Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2012; 21: 45-83
        • Kirschner P.A.
        • Sweller J.
        • Clark R.E.
        Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based,experiential, and inquiry-based teaching.
        Educational Psychologist. 2006; 41: 75-86
        • Kneebone R.L.
        • Scott W.
        • Darzi A.
        • Horrocks M.
        Simulation and clinical practice: Strengthening the relationship.
        Medical education. 2004; 38: 1095-1102
        • Knowles M.S.
        The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (Rev. and Updat ed.).
        Association Press, Wilton, Conn, Chicago1980
        • Loibl K.
        • Rummel N.
        Knowing what you don't know makes failure productive.
        Learning and Instruction. 2014; 34: 74-85
        • Lorenzet S.J.
        • Salas E.
        • Tannenbaum S.I.
        Benefiting from mistakes: the impact of guided errors on learning, performance, and self-efficacy.
        Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2005; 16: 301-322
        • Palominos E.
        • Levett-Jones T.
        • Power T.
        • Alcorn N.
        • Martinez-Maldonado R.
        Measuring the impact of productive failure on nursing students’ learning in healthcare simulation: A quasi-experimental study.
        Nurse Education Today. 2021; 101: 104871
        • Palominos E.
        • Levett-Jones T.
        • Power T.
        • Martinez-Maldonado R.
        Healthcare students’ perceptions and experiences of making errors in simulation: An integrative review.
        Nurse Education Today. 2019; 77: 32-39
        • Peddle M.
        • Bearman M.
        • McKenna L.
        • Nestel D.
        Getting it wrong to get it right”: Faculty perspectives of learning non-technical skills via virtual patient interactions.
        Nurse education today. 2020; 88: 1-7
        • QSR International Pty Ltd.
        Nvivo 12 (released in March 2020). from https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home.
        QSR International Pty Ltd, 2020
        • Rudolph J.W.
        • Simon R.
        • Raemer D.B.
        • Eppich W.J.
        Debriefing as formative assessment: Closing performance gaps in medical education.
        Academic Emergency Medicine. 2008; 15: 1010-1016
        • Satava R.M.
        The future of sugical simulation and surgical robotics.
        Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons. 2007; 92: 13
        • Savoldelli G.L.
        • Naik V.N.
        • Hamstra S.J.
        • Morgan P.J.
        [Les barriéres à ľutilisation de la formation basée sur simulateur]. [journal article].
        Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2005; 52: 944-950
        • Sitkin S.B.
        Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses.
        Department of Management, University of Texas, Austin1992
        • Turner S.
        • Harder N.
        Psychological safe environment: A concept analysis.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2018; 18: 47-55
        • Young J.E.
        • Williamson M.I.
        • Egan T.G.
        Students' reflections on the relationships between safe learning environments, learning challenge and positive experiences of learning in a simulated GP clinic.
        Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2016; 21: 63-77
        • Zendejas B.
        • Cook D.A.
        • Farley D.R.
        Teaching first or teaching last: does the timing matter in simulation-based surgical scenarios?.
        Journal of surgical education. 2010; 67: 432-438
        • Zhao B.
        Learning from errors: the role of context, emotion, and personality.
        Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2011; 32: 435-463
        • Ziv A.
        • Ben-David S.
        • Ziv M.
        Simulation based medical education: an opportunity to learn from errors.
        Medical Teacher. 2005; 27: 193-199
      2. Kapur, M. (2019). Productive Failure. Retrieved 10 March 2020, Available from: https://www.manukapur.com/productive-failure/, Accessed 10 Mar 2020.