« Previous
Next »
Collegian
Volume 16, Issue 3
, Pages 125-129
, July 2009
Ultimate doctor liability: A myth of ignorance or myth of control?
References
- . Avoiding medicare fraud part 2. Nurse Practitioner. 2001;26(2):34–41
- . Trends in nurse practitioner professional liability: An analysis of claims with risk management recommendations. Journal of Nursing Law. 2007;11(1):53–60
- . The myth of medical liability for nursing practice. Nursing Praxis in New Zealand. 2003;19(3):4–12
- . The capability of nurse practitioners may be diminished by controlling protocols. Australian Health Review. 2007;31(1):108–115
- . NP errors lead to litigation. The Nurse Practitioner. 2003;28(3):52–56
- . Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. British Medical Journal. 2002;324:819–823
- . The myth of vicarious liability. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 1994;39(2):98–106
- . Ethics and law for the health professions. 2nd ed.. Sydney: The Federation Press; 2005;
- . Tort reform: An issue for nurse practitioners. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 2004;16(2):74–79
- NSW Health. (2005). Nurse/Midwife practitioners in NSW. Policy for nurse/midwife practitioners in NSW. PD 2005_556. Retrieved 31 August, 2008, from http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/pd/2005/PD2005_556.html.
- NSW Nurses and Midwives Board. (2007). Being a nurse practitioner in New South Wales: NSW Nurses and Midwives Board.
- . NPs face challenges in the US and the UK. The Nurse Practitioner. 2007;32(7):25–29
- . Nursing and the law. 6th ed.. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone Australia; 2008;
PII: S1322-7696(09)00062-6
doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2009.06.003
« Previous
Next »
Collegian
Volume 16, Issue 3
, Pages 125-129
, July 2009
