Collegian
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 10-15, 2006

The role of performance feedback in the self-assessment of competence: A research study with nursing clinicians

    Dr
  • Jennifer Fereday, RGN, RM, Dip.App.Sci(Nsg) BN Med(Mgt) PhD (Children, Youth & Women's Health Service, Adelaide)

      Affiliations

    • University of South Australia
    • ,
  • Eimear Muir-Cochrane, BSc (Hons), RN, RMN, Grad Dip Adult Ed, MNS, PhD (Associate Professor)

Article Outline

Performance feedback has the potential to contribute to a nurse's self-awareness and, in turn, their ability to self-assess their level of competence. Because a declaration of self-assessment of competence is a current requirement for continuing nursing registration within South Australia, Queensland and Tasmania, the search to identify sources and processes that may assist nurses to self-assess their performance is potentially of benefit to the profession. This paper is based on one aspect of a PhD study exploring the utility of performance feedback primarily from a nursing clinicians' perspective. Focus group interviews were conducted with hospital-based nursing clinicians and the data were analysed using a process of thematic analysis.

Findings highlighted that nursing clinicians frequently engaged in a process of performance self-monitoring that was a balance between feeling competent and feeling uncertain in relation to their own level of clinical competence. On a daily basis, nursing clinicians held an assumption of competence to practise that was based on their ability to act in a situation, receiving positive feedback from others and in the absence of evidence to the contrary. At times feelings of doubt or uncertainty intervened especially in situations that were unfamiliar or challenging or when receiving feedback from others that questioned their own perceptions of competence. The findings of the study provide support for the types of self-monitoring processes that serve to enhance both the relevance of feedback for nurses and the quality of evaluative data regarding ongoing competence.

Key words:  Feedback , competence , self-assessment , professional practicer

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Australian Nursing Council 2000 Position statement: Continuing competence in nursing. Retrieved 14 April 2004 from World Wide Web: http://www.anc.org.au/02standards/_docs/Positions/Contin_comp.pdf
  2. ANC (Australian Nursing Council)  . National competency standards for the registered nurse and the enrolled nurse . 3rd edn.. Canberra: Australian Nursing Council; 2002;
  3. Bandura A . Self-efficacy – The exercise of control . New York: W H Freeman; 1997;
  4. Boyatzis R . Transforming qualitative information – Thematic analysis and code development . California: Sage Publications; 1998;
  5. Bradshaw A . Defining ‘competency’ in nursing (part 1): a policy review . Journal of Clinical Nursing . 1997;6:347–354
  6. Bradshaw A . Defining ‘competency’ in nursing (part II): an analytical review . Journal of Clinical Nursing . 1998;7:103–111
  7. Butler D , Winne P . Feedback and self-regulated earning: a theoretical synthesis . Review of Educational Research . 1995;65(3):245–281
  8. Crabtree B , Miller W . A template approach to text analysis: developing and using codebooks . In:  Crabtree B ,  Miller W editor. Doing qualitative research . Newbury Park: Sage; 1999;
  9. Donaghy M , Morss K . Guided reflection: a framework to facilitate and assess reflective practice within the discipline of physiotherapy . Physiotherapy Theory and Practice . 2000;16:3–14
  10. FitzGerald M , Walsh K , McCutcheon H . An integrative systematic review of indicators of competence for practice and protocol for validation of indicators of competence . Commissioned by Queensland Nursing Council; 2001;
  11. Frey J , Fontana A . The group interview in social research . In:  Morgan D editors. Successful focus groups – advancing the state of the art . California: Sage Publications; 1993;
  12. Girot E . Assessment of competence in clinical practice: a review of the literature . Nurse Education Today . 1993;13:83–90
  13. Huber D . Leadership and nursing care management . Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2000;
  14. Hulett K 2002 An honest evaluation. Advisor Today March: 86
  15. Johns C . Guided reflection: advancing practice . Oxford.: Blackwell Publishing; 2002;
  16. Kluger A , DeNisi A . The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory . Psychological Bulletin . 1996;119(2):254–284
  17. Kramar R , McGraw P , Schuler R . Human resource management in Australia . 3rd edn.. Melbourne: Longman; 1997;
  18. Krueger R , Casey M . Focus groups – a practical guide for applied research . 3rd edn.. California: Sage Publications; 2000;
  19. London M . Job feedback: giving, seeking, and using feedback for performance improvement . New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1997;
  20. Marriner-Tomey A . Guide to nursing management and leadership . 6th edn.. St Louis: Mosby; 2000;
  21. Meretoja R , Eriksson Leino-Kilpi H . Indicators for competent nursing practice . Journal of Nursing Management . 2002;10:95–102
  22. NBSA (Nurses Board Of South Australia)  . Your Practice, Continuing Competence and Self-Regulation . Adelaide: Nurses Board of South Australia; 2000;
  23. Pearson A, Fitz Gerald M, Borbasi S, Walsh K, Parkes R, Lazarrevic, L 2000 A study to identify the indicators of continuing competence in nursing: final report January 1999. Commissioned by Australian Nursing Council Inc
  24. Redfern S , Norman I , Calman L , Watson R , Murrells T . Assessing competence to practise in nursing: a review of the literature . Research Papers in Education . 2002;17(1):51–77
  25. Rice P , Ezzy D . Qualitative research methods – a health focus . Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 1999;
  26. Schein E , Bennis W . Personal and organizational change through group methods: the laboratory approach . New York: Wiley; 1965;
  27. Scheiwe D . The Australian nursing profession . In:  Clinton M ,  Scheiwe D editor. Management in the Australian health care industry . Australia: Longman; 1998;
  28. Schutz A . In:  Walsh G ,  Lehnert F editor. The phenomenology of the social world . Illinois: North Western University Press; 1967;
  29. Translation of Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt 1932
  30. Torbert W . Learning from experience – toward consciousness . New York: Columbia University Press; 1972;
  31. Watson R , Stimpson A , Topping A , Porock D . Clinical competence assessment in nursing: a systematic review of the literature . Journal of Advanced Nursing . 2002;39(5):421–431
  32. While A . Competence versus performance: which is more important? . Journal of Advanced Nursing . 1994;20:525–531
  33. Winne P . Inherent details in self-regulated learning . Educational Psychologist . 1995;30(4):173–187
  34. Winne P . Self-regulation is ubiquitous but its forms vary with knowledge . Educational Psychologist . 1995;30(4):223–228
  35. Yalom I . The theory and practice of group psychotherapy . 4th edn.. New York: Basic Books; 1995;
  36. Yearly C . Guided reflection as a tool for CPD . British Journal of Midwifery . 2003;11(4):223–226
  37. Yoder-Wise P . Leading and managing in nursing . 3rd edn.. St Louis: Mosby; 2003;

PII: S1322-7696(08)60511-9

doi:10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60511-9

Collegian
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 10-15, 2006

Article Tools