Collegian
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 5-9, 2006

The moral imperative of designating patient safety and quality care as a national nursing research priority

    Professor
  • Megan-Jane Johnstone, PhD BA RN FRCNA (Professor of Nursing & Director of Research, Division of Nursing & Midwifery)

      Affiliations

    • RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria
    • , Professor
  • Olga Kanitsaki, AM, PhD, MEdStud, DipHospNsgUnitManag, BAppSc(AdvNsg), CM, RN, FRCNA (Adjunct Professor, Division of Nursing & Midwifery)

      Affiliations

    • RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria

Article Outline

Since the early 1990s, research studies conducted respectively in the USA, UK and Australia have found that between 4 and 16.6 per cent of patients suffer from some kind of harm (including permanent disability and death) as a result of human errors and adverse events while in hospital. It has been further estimated that approximately 50 per cent of these human errors/adverse events resulting in harm could have been prevented. In response to the significant financial, social, and political implications of these figures, a range of processes have been put in place in an attempt to improve patient safety and quality care in Australia. Nonetheless, it is evident that more can be done to improve the status quo. One process that warrants consideration is that of peak health professional groups and organisations providing active leadership in the promotion of patient safety, such as by making a visible and recognisable commitment to patient safety as a strategic research priority area. In this paper it is contended that, given the moral importance of patient safety and quality care in nursing and related health care domains, the inseparable link between nursing practice and patient safety, and the central role that research has to play in driving safety improvements in these domains, it is morally imperative that the nursing profession gives sustained and focussed public attention to patient safety and quality care as a national research priority.

Key words:  nursing research , patient safety , quality care , ethics , national research priorities

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. In:  Adams K ,  Corrigan J editor. Priority areas for national action: transforming health care quality . Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2003;
  2. Aiken L , Clarke S , Cheung R , Sloane D , Silber J . Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality . JAMA . 2003;290(12):1617–1623
  3. Aiken L , Clarke S , Sloane D , Sochalski J . Nurses' reports on hospital care in five countries . Health Affairs . 2001;20(3):43–53
  4. Armstrong F . How safe are our hospitals? . Australian Nursing Journal . 2004;11(9):18–21
  5. Barraclough B . Safety and quality in Australian healthcare: making progress . Medical Journal of Australia . 2001;174(18):616–617
  6. Barraclough B 2004 Advancing the patient safety agenda: an Australian perspective. Background paper prepared for The Commonwealth Fund/Nuffield Trust Conference, Improving Quality of Health Care in the United States and the United Kingdom: Strategies for Change and Action, Pennyhill Park, Bagshot, England, 11–13 July, 2003 [available at http://www.safetyandquality.org/index.cfm?page=About -accessed 29 June 2004]
  7. Brennan T, Leape L, Laird L, Hebert L, Localio R, Lawthers A, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalised patients: results of the Harvard medical practice Study I . New England Journal of Medicine . 1991;324(6):370–376
  8. Clark R . Health care and notions of risk . Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Ltd; 2004;
  9. Committee on Quality of Health care in America, Institute of Medicine  . Crossing the chasm: a new health system for the 21st century . Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001;
  10. Cook R, Woods D, Miller C 1998 A tale of two stories: contrasting views of patient safety. National Patient Safety Foundation at the AMA, Chicago [available at http://www.npsf.org-accessed 13 September 2004]
  11. Cook RI , Render M , Woods DD . Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety . British Medical Journal . 2000;320(7237):791–794
  12. Department of Health 2000 An organisation with a memory: report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS. Do H, London
  13. Department of Health  . Building a safer NHS for patients . London: The Stationery Office; 2001;
  14. Donaldson L . Championing patient safety: going global . Quality & Safety in Health Care . 2002;11(2):112
  15. Hayward R , Hofer T . Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer . JAMA . 2001;286(4):415–420
  16. Henneman E , Gawlinski A . A “near miss” model for describing the nurse's role in the recovery of medical errors . Journal of Professional Nursing . 2004;20(3):196–201
  17. In:  Kohn L ,  Corrigan J ,  Donaldson M editor. To err is human: building a safer health system . Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2000;
  18. Kuhn A , Youngberg B . The need for risk management to evolve to assure a culture of safety . Quality & Safety in Health Care . 2002;11(2):158–162
  19. Lilford R . Patient safety research: does it have legs? . Quality & Safety in Health Care . 2002;11(2):113–114
  20. McNeil J , Ogden K , Briganti E , Ibrahim J , Loff B , Majoor J . Improving patient safety in Victorian Hospitals . Melbourne: Victorian Department of Human Services; 2000;
  21. Needleman J , Buerhaus P , Mattke S , Stewart M , Zelevinsky K . Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals . New England Journal of Medicine . 2002;346(22):1715–1722
  22. In:  Page A editors. Keeping patients safe: transforming the work environment of nurses . Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2004;
  23. Reason J . Human error . New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990;
  24. Reason J . Human error: models and management . British Medical Journal . 2000;320(7237):768–770
  25. Runciman M . Qualitative versus quantitative research — balancing cost, yield and feasibility . Anaesthesia & Intensive Care . 1993;21:502–505
  26. Runciman W, Moller J 2001 Iatrogenic injury in Australia. Report for the National Health Priorities and Quality Branch of the Department of Health and Aged Care of the Commonwealth Government of Australia, Australian Patient Safety Foundation [available at www.apsf.net.au – accessed 4 June 2004]
  27. Schmerling A , Schattner P , Piterman L . Qualitative research in medical practice . Medical Journal of Australia . 1993;158:619–622
  28. Shindul-Rothschild J , Berry D , Long-Middleton E . Where have all the nurses gone? Final results of our patient care survey . American Journal of Nursing . 1996;96(11):25–39
  29. Shindul-Rothschild J , Long-Middleton E , Berry D . 10 keys to quality care . American Journal of Nursing . 1997;97(11):35–43
  30. Thomas E , Brennan T . Errors and adverse events in medicine: an overview . In:  Vincent C editors. Clinical risk management . 2nd edn.. London: BMJ Books; 2001;p. 31–43 2001:
  31. Thomson, R, Carthey J 2004 National Patient Safety Agency Research and Development Strategy. National Patient Safety Agency, London [available at www.npsa.nhs.uk – accessed 1 September 2004]
  32. In:  Vincent C editors. Clinical risk management . 2nd edn.. London: BMJ Books; 2001;
  33. Wilson R , Runciman W , Gibberd R , Harrison B , Newby L , Hamilton J . The quality in Australian health care study . Medical Journal of Australia . 1995;163(6 November):458–471
  34. World Health Organisation (WHO) 2001 ‘Quality of care: patient safety: report by the Secretariat’, Executive Board 109th Session, Provisional agenda item 3.4 (EB109/9) 5 December [available at www.who.int/ – accessed 10/09/03]
  35. World Health Organisation (WHO) 2002a ‘Quality of care: patient safety’. Agenda item 13.9 Fifty-Fifth World Health Assembly (WHA55.18). 18 May [available at www.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA55/ewha5518.pdf – accessed 15/07/04]
  36. World Health Organisation (WHO) 2002b ‘Outcome of the Fifty-Fifth World Health Assembly’, Executive Board 110th Session, Provisional agenda item 3 (EB110/2)). 18 May [available at www.who.int/- accessed 10/09/03]

PII: S1322-7696(08)60510-7

doi:10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60510-7

Collegian
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 5-9, 2006

Article Tools