Collegian
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 79-83, April 2009

Preferences for continuing education through existing electronic access for Australian Nurse Practitioners and its implication in prescribing potential

  • Claire Newman, RN, MN

      Affiliations

    • University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Health and NSW Justice Health, Suite 302 Level 2, 152 Bunnerong Rd, Eastgardens, NSW 2036, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 8372 3003.
  • ,
  • Thomas Buckley, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Health, Australia
  • ,
  • Sandra Dunn, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Charles Darwin University, Australia
  • ,
  • Andrew Cashin, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Health, Australia

Received 27 June 2008; received in revised form 13 October 2008; accepted 16 October 2008. published online 20 April 2009.

Summary 

Background

Little is known about Australian Nurse Practitioners (NPs) perceptions of the importance of continuing education (CE), their preferred methods to undertake CE in relation to prescribing practices or their access to electronic resources at work. Nurse Practitioner access to computerised technology may increase their provision of resources, provide point of care technology, and increase opportunities to participate in CE.

Purpose

This paper aims to explore Australian NP preferences for continuing education and NP access to electronic mediums that may increase CE opportunities.

Methods

A self-administered online survey was completed by 68 NPs from across Australia.

Results

The majority of respondents (93%) viewed CE to be very important and preferred methods of continuing education included receipt of information by email, and interactive online case studies. Respondents working in metropolitan areas had increased access to high speed Internet in comparison to NPs working in rural or remote areas, although this did not reach statistical significance (88% vs. 69%, p=0.07). Significantly more NPs working in metropolitan areas had access to a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) than NPs working in rural or remote areas (44% vs. 6%, p=0.003).

Conclusion

This is the first national survey to report preference for CE and access to technology of NPs in Australia. Electronic technology can provide programmed support such as online learning and resources through computers and PDAs to maximise NP prescribing potential.

Keywords: Nurse Practitioner, Continuing education, Point of care technology, Personal Digital Assistants, Elearning

 

PII: S1322-7696(08)00064-4

doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2008.10.001

Collegian
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 79-83, April 2009