Collegian
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 35-41 , February 2008

‘Never mind the quality, feel the width’: The nonsense of ‘quality’, ‘excellence’, and ‘audit’ in education, health and research

  • Philip Darbyshire, RNMH, RSCN, Dip.N.(Lond.), RNT, MN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 8 8161 6468/6497; fax: +61 8 8161 7704/8 8395 8756.

,Accepted 16 November 2007.

References 

  1. Abbasi K. Why journals can live without impact factor and cluster bombs. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2007;100(3):113–1113
  2. Allan KL. Excellence: A new keyword for education?. Critical Quarterly. 2007;49(1):54–78
  3. Anon. (1999, January 31, 1999). Why you can’t believe everything you read…and the challenges of the Information Age. Retrieved November 11, 2007, from http://www.apmforum.com/news/apmn233.htm.
  4. Brecher B. Complicity and modularisation: How universities were made safe for the market. Critical Quarterly. 2005;47(1–2):72–82
  5. Charlton, B. (2002). Audit, accountability, quality and all that: The growth of managerial technologies in UK universities. Retrieved November 12, 2007, from http://www.hedweb.com/bgcharlton/audit.html.
  6. Charlton BG, Andras P. Universities and social progress in modernising societies: How educational expansion has replaced socialism as an instrument of political reform. Critical Quarterly. 2005;47(1–2):30–39
  7. Cheek, J., Garnham, B., & Quan, J. (2006). What's in a number? Issues in providing evidence of impact and quality of research(ers). Qualitative Health Research, 16(3), 423–435.
  8. Chew M, Villanueva EV, Van Der Weyden MB. Life and times of the impact factor: Retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994–2005) and their Editors’ views. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2007;100(3):142–150
  9. Darbyshire P. Preserving nurse caring in a destitute time. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1993;18(4):507–508
  10. Duignan, P. (2005). Performance Based Research Fund (PBRF) intervention logic, evaluation and monitoring framework discussion paper. Parker Duignan Ltd. 31-10-2005 from http://www.tec.govt.nz/upload/downloads/PBRF-intervention-logic-document.pdf.
  11. Furedi F. Where have all the intellectuals gone? Confronting 21st century philistinism. New York: Continuum; 2004;
  12. Gombrich, R. F. (2000). British higher education policy in the last twenty years: The murder of a profession. Paper presented at the Graduate Institute of Policy Studies (GRIPS), from http://www.atm.damtp.cam.ac.uk/people/mem/papers/LHCE/uk-higher-education.html#tthFrefACH#tthFrefACH.
  13. Horrocks S. Scholarship, teaching and calculative thinking: A critique of the audit culture in UK nurse education. Nurse Education Today. 2006;26:4–10
  14. Howie G. Universities in the UK: Drowning by numbers introduction. Critical Quarterly. 2005;47(1–2):1–10
  15. Land, R. (2006). Paradigms lost: Academic practice and exteriorising technologies [Electronic Version]. E-learning (pp. 100–110). Retrieved November 9, 2007 from http://www.wwwords.co.uk/pdf/viewpdf.asp?j=elea&vol=3&issue=1&year=2006&article=10_Land_ELEA_3_1_web&id=121.209.48.253.
  16. Loughlin M. Critique: The illusion of quality. Health Care Analysis. 1993;1(1):69–73
  17. Loughlin M. Critique: The poverty of management. Health Care Analysis. 1994;2(2):135–139
  18. Loughlin M. Critique: The wall paper re-examined. Health Care Analysis. 1995;3(2):127–134
  19. Loughlin M. Ethics, management and mythology: Rational decision making for health service professionals. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2002;
  20. Loughlin M. On the buzzword approach to policy formation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2002;8(2):229–242
  21. Loughlin M. Quality, control and complicity the effortless conquest of the academy by bureaucrats. International Journal of the Humanities. 2004;2(1):717–724
  22. Loughlin M. A platitude too far: ’Evidence-based ethics’. Commentary on Borry (2006), Evidence-based medicine and its role in ethical decision-making. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2006;12:306–311Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12(3), 312–318
  23. Loughlin M. Style, substance, Newspeak ’and all that’: A commentary on Murray et al. (2007) and an open challenge to Goldacre and other ’offended’ apologists for EBM. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2007;13(4):517–521
  24. Luker K. Assessing the quality of research: A challenge for nursing. Nursing Inquiry. 2007;14(1):1
  25. Lund D. Is the impact factor important?. Journal of Food Science Education. 2006;5(4):58–158
  26. Miles A, Loughlin M. Continuing the evidence-based health care debate in 2006. The progress and price of EBM. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2006;12(4):385–398
  27. Miles A, Loughlin M, Polychronis A. Medicine and evidence: Knowledge and action in clinical practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2007;13(4):481–503
  28. O’Neill O. A Question of trust: The BBC Reith lectures 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002;
  29. Perryman J. Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy. 2006;21(2):147–161
  30. Power, M. (1996). The audit explosion. London: Demos, from http://www.demos.co.uk/files/theauditexplosion.pdf.
  31. Power M. The Audit Society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997;
  32. Preston DS. Managerialism and the post-enlightenment crisis of the British university. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2001;33(3):343–363
  33. Readings B. The university in ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press; 1996;
  34. Reisner, A. (2007). When you’ve got a bad idea, work it to death and hang the cost to the nation. The funneled Web. Retrieved November 6, 2007, from http://www.the-funneled-web.com/Old_Editorials/ed-30_08_07.htm.
  35. Rogers LF. Impact factor: The numbers game. American Journal of Radiography. 2002;178:541–542
  36. Russell-Edu W. The impact for you: Your job may depend on it—But do you know what is it?. Cancer Futures. 2003;2(July/August):171–175
  37. Shewan, L. G., & Coats, A. J. S. (2006). The Research Quality Framework and its implications for health and medical research: Time to take stock? The Medical Journal of Australia, 184(9), 463–466, from http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/184_09_010506/she10099_fm.html.
  38. Smith R. Commentary: The power of the unrelenting impact factor—Is it a force for good or harm?. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2006;35:1129–1130
  39. Sparkes AC. Embodiment, academics, and the audit culture: A story seeking consideration. Qualitative Research. 2007;7(4):521–550
  40. In:  Strathern M editors. Audit Culture: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London: Routledge; 2000;
  41. Tapper, T., & Salter, B. (2002). The politics of governance in higher education: The case of the research assessment exercises. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Higher Education Policy, from http://oxcheps.new.ox.ac.uk/MainSite%20pages/Resources/OxCHEPS_OP6%20doc.pdf.
  42. Thomas, P. (2005). Is the audit culture going too far? Retrieved November 6, 2007, from http://www.usc.edu.au/University/MediaPublications/VCColumn/ArchivedColumns/2005/AuditCultureColumn.htm.
  43. Tuck A. Impact factors: A tool of the sterile audit culture. Nature. 2003;424(3):14–114
  44. Watson D. Death sentence. The decay of public language. Sydney: Knopf; 2003;

☆ It should be obvious that the views expressed in this paper are my own and may not be shared by any organisation that I am associated with. Apart from a few pet hates and sacred cows, no animals were harmed in the writing of this paper.

PII: S1322-7696(07)00004-2

doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2007.11.003

Collegian
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 35-41 , February 2008

Article Tools